fatslob-:O said:
cyberninja45 said:
fatslob-:O said:
EricFabian said:
fatslob-:O said:
| enditall727 said:
The reason people bought the WII was mostly because of first party titles
if this was the case then why didn't people buy the N64 and GC for the first party? There were quality titles on N64 AND GC so what was their excuse?
|
@Bold Alot of the titles on the N64 weren't high quality with a few exceptions but as for gamecube there's even less quality titles as evidenced by the game sales. People bought the PS1 and PS2 instead because they were the better systems with better games, simple as that.
|
Sales =/= Quality. Stop with this. You are wrong.
|
Then tell me how I am wrong ?
|
While quality is subjective and differs from person to person sales do not equal quality. It's simple really since games are interactive entertainment you would have to you know interact with it to be able to judge this quality, only after doing this would you be able to judge the quality of that game (since people have different taste a quality product would differ depending on the person).
Now unless you are telling me you have the ability to judge the quality of a game without actually playing it I just explained to you why you are wrong.
|
Then tell me why the masses would go about purchasing a bad game then ? Selling to the masses is more trickier than you think.
|
As much as we like to group people together in general terms like the masses or the public or hardcore/casual or whatever if 90 million people bought a game those are 90 million individuals, each one of them having a different experience with that game. How would you know each person experience with the game?
Again quality is subjective according to each and everyone of those 90 million individuals, there is no gamer or person that plays a game called the masses, sales would not be an indication of that person interpretation of quality in that game.
