By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
enditall727 said:

Lmao! I'm on to what you're doing.

You mean nothing ? Cause that's where your clearly headed with your argument.

The review is pretty much what is said about the game. Im not talking about the review score. Im talking about just the review where there is a description of what the reviewer thought about the game.

What good is a description if nobody buys games based on what the review says ?

If a game is being advertised, how would you know if it was trash or not?

Once again the best advertising isn't going to save a game. If the game gets good advertising but flops then you can clearly tell that it was trash.

Yea if the quality of a title is bad then its sales will eventually halt a lot quicker than it would have if it was Quality. And when did i say that the best selling games on the Wij were shovelware? Go back and show me whsre i said this

It sounds like you admitted defeat on that first line here.

A friend being biased is no different from anybody else. You would never really know if somebody is being biased UNTIL YOU HAVE PLAYED THE GAME FOR YOURSELF. After that, your opinions on the game could be just as biased  as the person you claimed was biased in the 1st place.

The only way to remove the bias is using sales as a measurement of quality. A consensus on a form of entertainment is better and more relevant than an argument against a stigmatized gaming community around here. 

And i was just using SM3DW as an example. You just weren't able to comprehend it much like everything else;)

It sounds like you failed to use your example to prove your point.