fatslob-:O said:
enditall727 said:
fatslob-:O said:
enditall727 said:
fatslob-:O said:
| enditall727 said:
The reason people bought the WII was mostly because of first party titles
if this was the case then why didn't people buy the N64 and GC for the first party? There were quality titles on N64 AND GC so what was their excuse?
|
@Bold Alot of the titles on the N64 weren't high quality with a few exceptions but as for gamecube there's even less quality titles as evidenced by the game sales. People bought the PS1 and PS2 instead because they were the better systems with better games, simple as that.
|
alot of the titles on Wii weren't high quality either so that claim doesn't hold any weight
as for gamecube there's even less quality titles as evidenced by the game sales
give me a few examples
|
Alot of titles on the WII were high quality. If you count the amount games that reached over 1+ million then the WII would be the obvious winner.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_Wii_video_games
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_Nintendo_GameCube_video_games
|
But still a lot of them weren't high quality either, like i said before
And it almost seems like you're trying to say that sales = quality.
|
How are they not high quality ?
@Bold What's the issue with that ? Ever heard the term "the customers always right" ? What the masses define as quality is more relevant than what you and the others as well on game forums define as quality.
|
Are we.. Are we trying to act brand new all of a sudden? The Wii has over 1000 titles in its library but all of them were not quality. The Wii had some quality titles in that library but anybody could tell you that the Wii had shovelware. This all goes back to the point of me saying that a lot of the games on the Wii weren't high quality either just like you tried to say with the N64. That logic didn't really make any sense
and you just basically admitted that you think that sales = quality.. Lol
We'll just leave it right at that
