By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ninetailschris said:
curl-6 said:
ninetailschris said:

 Do you honestly feel people scared of homosexuals? The idea is to protect marriage not because we want gays dead or hate gays.

Marriage doesn't need protection. Homosexuality does not threaten it.


I would beg to differ. What you are doing is re-defining marriage and rights to whatever someone personally feels. Why not allow multiple wives and husbands? Why not allow marriage between animals and humans? Why not with children under the age of 13? Why not with anything. If you re-define basic rights as anyone could do whatever they like because it's right than you have to question why can't just create my own rights. Why are your rights more true than mine?  Why is anything not a right. Your left with everything relative and nothing meanings anything because it's meaningless like Nietzsche would say. 

Is human rights a man made idea in which is completely subjective and if so why not just say your opinion is as neutral as the opposite opinion? Example, did the nazi do anything wrong because they believe humans rights were for there specific people oppose to you who felt the opposite? Is it just a difference in moral opinions on human rights?

Your whole argument is so flawed it's not even funny.

Man - Woman

Man - Man

Woman - Woman.

2 adults that love each other and are in a consensual relationship.

How you jump from

Man - Woman - Woman

Man - Animal

Ect, is disgusting and weak. You know it's not at all comparable but you need to find a way to justify "I don't like it" plain and simple.

Marriage is not threatened by gay people, I would say the millions of straight couples that divorce each year are more a threat of devaluing it, and even then it's not a big deal.