S.T.A.G.E. said:
zorg1000 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Einsam_Delphin said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
I can only see this as a desperate act by Nintendo until the real Zelda comes out. Same thing they did with Star Fox Adventures but they had Dynasty Warriors reskinned this time. |
Or it could just be a game they wanted to make. Not every game in a franchise has to be a mainline installment. |
No. Nintendo did the exact same thing with StarFox Adventures. The Gamecube had a similar problem with games coming out. The demand must really be getting to them. Miyamoto forced Rare to reskin Star Fox Adventures in a similar fashion when they were working on a new IP back in the GC era. This will probably turn out worse. Nintendo isn't making the game. Its the Dynasty Warriors team.
The only way I can see this being a hit is if people are fans of Dynasty Warriors. From the look at the sales on VG Chartz of Dynasty Warriors their glory days were in the early 2000's on the PS2 and thats where it ends.
If you don't remember history you're doomed to repeat it.
|
They must have also been desperate in 2010 when they added Kirby to Epic Yarn when it was originally going to be a new ip.
|
You're obviously not getting it. That is akin to paper mario where 2D meets stylization. Its easier to reskin a 2D game, cheaper and better for the sake of time than a 3D game which takes actual thought to eventually feel natural and unforced. This is taking a game that has nothing to do with your game and reskinning it to meed demand. This is strike two on Nintendo for cheap attempts to use Zelda within a short period of time when what they advetised was this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_fyOkrteqM
This is not going to breathe life into Zelda again. Star Fox Adventures should've been Dinosaur Adventures, plain and simple. They got Tecmo to reskin one of its most niche and repetitive franchises. Zelda is not Dynasty warriors, I assure you.
|
I do get it and Epic Yarn is the same thing, it was originally a new Ip called Fluff of Yarn and u played as Prince Fluff. Midway thru development they decided to add Kirby. By ur logic Nintendo was desperate in 2009/2010 when they made the change despite outselling the competition for the past few years.
