By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fatslob-:O on 19 December 2013
Edit Thread
DanneSandin said:
fatslob-:O said:
DanneSandin said:
fatslob-:O said:
Mr Khan said:
fatslob-:O said:
Mr Khan said:
fatslob-:O said:
Their software has become irrelevant for the most part and the quality dwindled as well with it.

You're going to need to quantify that, or be moderated for a hit-and-run statement.

Tell me, if their software is truly valuable as people speak of them to be then why is nobody buying their titles ? 

You have to define all of these terms. It's also the "quality" part that concerns me.

If we define quality as sales then everything becomes simple. We can infer quality from sales and vice versa. I can say that that quality and sales are one in the same because people go out of there way to give something of value in exchange for a product. The market is always looking for quality in a product and quality is once again defined by the market. 

So basically Wii Fit > tlou and bioshock infinite?

Easy as that.

So the Wii might be the best console ever since it has the best selling games of all times? Well, that one and the DS. Both consoles have more games that sold more than 20m than the PS2, so in a sense Wii/DS> PS2. Yeah, try telling that to people ;)

I'm pretty sure that the quality of the console is determined by it's sales just as how the quality of the game is determined by it's own sales. Nice try though.