| outlawauron said: Stop melting down for a second, and actually read what I said. Past cases, we have two GT examples (which sold waaaaaaay less than 10%) and hundreds of other games that available both digitally and retail. There's really no need to get so defensive and banking on magical digital sales which are always lower than you hope for major titles. |
Ok i did not want to bring this up, but ok, if this is so front an center about the digital sale through number's on content from Sony, where is the data? its not about melting down, its about calling out the claim for being what it is, many times i keep hearing this as poor digital data sale through number's on here but no proof, as a matter of fact Playstation Home for instance has very large digital sale through number's, yes that's not game's like retail sales, but you cannot sit there and call the sales through data "poor" of=r that they do not matter if there is not clear reference point.
I ask again is this sate want to be as accurte as they can for number's or only when its convenient, to cause a spike in hits not because they want to be accurate in number's , but because it will be a hot topic that will net more result hit's?
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=166982
" magical digital sales which are always lower than you hope for major titles."
so you and other's are trying to frame the argument that digital sale copy's selling into the millions is somehow does not count for attachment number's, and that you cannot count them so only physical copy's count in the number's!
Do they count or not? Like i stated if you cannot count them than lets discount all digital sales through Data , if that is the case for every software copy.

I AM BOLO
100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...
ps:
Proud psOne/2/3/p owner. I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.







