fatslob-:O said:
Define "consumer" because if we look up at the dictionary it means "a person who aquires goods and services for his or her own personal needs" and by using that definition it clearly means that everyone is a consumer because they need basic resources such as food and shelter so they are essentially "consuming" in this sense. Your the one who looks foolish now. It's better than bringing up dumb fallacies such as the "impulse buy" excuse. Yet your clearly grasping at straws here because I asked why sales were not "comparable". Can you explain to me why there is over a "20 million" game sales difference between these titles despite having almost the scores? I thought so and you probably can't explain why the rest of the shit is different ... Start by properly reading somone's post or you'll only keep giving dumb replies.
Well gee if that's true then why are there soo many inconsistencies ? The highest rated game in 2008 which was GTA 4 got beaten by mario kart WII. Can you explain the same for 2009 when uncharted 2 got shitted on by COD WAW in terms of sales ? Or how about in 2010 when super mario galaxy 2 got it's ass handed to Red Dead Redemption ? You probably couldn't do the same in 2011 for why Batman got destroyed by the likes of battlefield 3. If I don't know how the market operates then you obviously don't know shit about the market. The masses clearly do not operate on game scores. Guess what ? These are all games different from each other so no excuses. Don't give more "it's on smaller install base" crap. The point of the game is that it's supposed to make you buy the god damned console.
The one with impaired logic is you cause you clearly can't explain all these distortions between the game sales and metacritic scores. Give up dude, it's obvious that review scores =/= sales. |
Yes, please, add more filler to the conversation because we are well aware at this point that you have nothing intelligent to contribute. Unless things work differently in the the UK "Not every single person has the ability to make purchases" . To assume that is to make an ass out of your self, which you have clearly done agian. Oh and now due to your inability to intelligently debate you basically copy and paste my comments directed at you "properly reading and straw man". So for the thousandth time, THOROUGHLY READ MY RESPONSE. I gave you a clear explanation as to the difference in sales between the two games. You need to go back to highschool if you cannot understand why 160 million consoles combined would have substantially larger sales for a game released several months ago than SMW3D which was released 3 weeks ago. Do you need further explanation?
"Shakes head" you clearly do no read responses and go off in a nonsensical rant without actually addressing the comment properly. All of those games were reviewed with high scores? Correct. Therefore as I said earlier high scores contribute to sales, which is correct. If you underestimate the average consumers ability to incorporate reviews into their buying decision of a game (Wii was the exception) then your even less intelligent that I thought. Marketing is a big factor as well as previously stated.
I clearly did explain the differences. Your inability to process information when it's provided to you is not my fault. Your pathetic attempts at continuing this conversation with nonesense and attempting to put words in my mouth by not looking at every fact I stated (reviews "contribute" , marketing significantly "contributes") once again proves you have absolutley no clue what you are talking about. You've been defeated but by all means keep the comments coming, it's rather amusing.
" Rebellion Against Tyrants Is Obedience To God"
