oniyide said:
spot on both posts |
You know what that is called??? Being reasonable, it may not be hard if you don't get to attached to the object of analysis...
I accept that for several Ninty 1st party is better than Sony (even if I preffer the genres Sony develop, but buy some of Ninty games that I care about), and that Xbox 1st sells more even if because they launch less titles... so why would I dispute the reasons why Halo sells more than Uncharted or GoW sells more than GoW (see what I done here?)

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







