| superhippy420 said: And yes that may seem really harsh but thats the business side reality of it all. Its the real reason why they charge us $60 a year for a subscription, because no one wants their 1st party titles. Nintendo could charge too but they sell so much software that they don't need to ask for their customers for $60 a year. |
I like your posts, you make a lot of sense. Nintendo have the best IPs in the business, no question, and im sure that a majority of their franchises arent expensive games to make (Zelda and Metroid aside). Most Ninty games are pretty much nailed on to sell a million plus, even on a small install base such as the Wii U. Thats why i believe Nintendo can acheive modest sales like the Gamecube and still thrive because their software is very profitable.
