mysteryman said:
No offence, but even if you hate the gamepad, you should be able to see this is a horrible idea. It would split the userbase. Support for the gamepad would drop due to it no longer being included with the console, leading to alienating earlier adopters. The console was designed from the start with low latency streaming to the gamepad in mind. It would be a complete waste of resources (both current manufacturing and previous research and development) to start producing gamepad-less consoles. The gamepad is a solid idea, even Microsoft and Sony think so, or they wouldn't be making their own versions. That said, you can use a wiimote or pro-controller if you want. There's an official extended life battery, and you can always play with the gamepad plugged in for longer sessions. The best bet is to push out more quality games, try and win over more third party support, and get the awareness of the product out there. |
see now if somewhere, anywhere on the box or at the stores someone told me i could use the pro remote instead of the gamepad i would have picked a WiiU up, the gamepad is just too big for tv use, also theres already confusion surround the WiiU, when i first saw it i thought it was a new version of the Wii not a whole new console, Nintendo should have never named it WiiU, i get the idea of the Gamepad, i use my Vita currently to remote play and such. but i just dont want to hold a tablet size controller the whole time i play a zelda game thats 40+ hours long. if the Pro Remote will work for more then a second controller then i may pick up a WiiU.








