By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
tbone51 said:
Lucas-Rio said:

I did not like 3D Land and don't want Mario 3D to be as limited as a 2D game and based on multiplayer and simpliest design. I like Zelda Between World but would be pissed if Wii U Zelda was made the same way.

To me , this game should have been 3DS and we have been robbed of the true 3D Mario. That's why I like this game selling poorly. It can say "never do it anymore" to Nintendo. Galaxy's games sold great.


You dont make any type of sense, both games are different. They didn't rob you of anything, did they promise you a Galaxy successor? Did you pay them to develop SMG3???

Wanting a game to sell bad just cuz they didn't develop wat you wanted is very selfish. And beside, everybody will most likely disagree with you. SM3DW is a masterpiece. Its not praised for nothing. Most people ate crow after realizing that they doubted Nintendo of making a great game.

Somebody like you wont give it a chance cuz it didn't go your way? Really? Ok... Maybe we dont deserve SMG3 cuz all us nintendo fans complain -_- 

(oh yeah, wiiu doing terrible, so if SM3DW fails then guess wat, SMG3 wont come like at all!) 

 

I think that yes, we were robbed of a true and big Mario 3D game, because every 3D Nintendo home console have had a true Mario game in its first years, excepted Wii U.  It's pretty clear that this game stood in the way of a brand new 3D Mario.

 

I won't give this game a try because:

1) I found Mario 3D Land above average but far from great

2) I don't like multiplayer based platformers

3) I have seen many footages of this game, none interested me.

 

I would have bought the Wii U for Galaxy 3 without any doubt. Now I have to wait a game which will raise my interest.