Why is no one complaining about paying for PSN?

[Euphoria14]

DraconianAC said:

Euphoria14 said:

That is the main thing, the value. I held off on PSN+ for 2 1/2 years and only got it because of GoW Collection and it's free 1-month PSN+ code.

 

I shortly thereafter grabbed a 3-month sub to see how much "value" I got, and I was impressed. Of course this is because I owned a PS3 and a PS Vita. Many games I bought and later sold (Due to money restrictions) suddenly became available again. It was awesome, plus I got Rayman for Vita, which I wanted to buy but wouldn't shell out $30-$40 for.

Now I have a PS4 and thanks to BF and Gamestop I got a year for just $30. I am currenly set until Feb 2015 and from now until then I am positive that the games I get to play for my $30 ($50 without a deal) will far outweight what I paid into the service.

It is fantastic value, which is what makes it stand out amongst the rest. This is apparent to me since I am normally a frequent game renter from Redbox and/or Gamefly. Those services costs add up to A LOT more than PSN+.

I bought both subscriptions at $50 dollars, and even though I know I'm paying extra to play online; it feels more like a online rental service much like Netflix, but with a very limited choice that changes every 1 or 2 months, and the choices you download you get to keep for the remainder of the time you have the service.

$30 dollars a better deal, I just hope the choices don't suffer if Sony decides to pay more for servers than game licenses.

If the service they currently provides ever reduces, it is a simple response.

I cancel.