The 2008 US Presidential Election - Any opinions?

[omgwtfbbq]

ckmlb said:

Erik Aston said:
Guiliani is a fearmonger even more than W. He's basically claiming that the country will not be safe with a Democrat as president. (That's the nice way to put it. A more correct/politically incorrect way might be saying that he's a terrorist who's message is "elect me or die.")

Despite his claims, 9/11 happened on his watch, with the full warning of the first WTC attack. And his major policy in the wake of 9/11 was to postpone the NYC elections for his own benefit; undermining our democracy due to fear, just as Islamic extremists want.




To everyone saying they don't support Ron Paul merely because he's unelectable: YOU'RE THE PROBLEM. You should be ashamed if you support anyone but whoever you think is the best candidate.

They're not the problem.

The system is the problem. Everything depends on how much money you can get, how do you get money? From catering to the needs of a few and sounding like you care about the many...

It's sad really. Giuliani will win cause he is a fearmonger, he will scare the people into voting for him, especially if another attack happaned in the future.

no, both are the problem.

I'm sick of the "lesser of two evils" approach that you people have. Vote for the person you think that is the best representative. If everyone who liked Ron Paul voted for him then maybe he would see something.

Although I live in Australia and our political system isn't as ridiculously favoured toward two main parties.

I would also like to add, HEAR HEAR, Erik Aston!