0815user said:
so you're basicly saying that the positive times article is more valid than the negative CNET statement, right? well then how about the sum of all the negative wii-u media statements this year against the sum of all the positive wii-u statements in the same period? would that count as a more valid counter argument? |
No I am saying what value does your post add to this thread other than the pure intent of trying to yet again derail a postive wii u thread. This is all this forum does.







