SocialistSlayer said:
killzone series in know to have great gameplay, and multiplayer. where they are usually criticized is story. and usually overly so, because other FPS get passes on their stories, while killzone has a much longer campaign than 90% of FPS and an above average storyline compared to most FPS (especially the like of Battlefield, COD, and Crysis) |
KZ is known to have great gameplay? By who? Not the majority of reviewers. KZ's main problem has always been its gameplay. It does nothing really to set itself apart from those very games you listed. Instead it just lifts elements from those games. KZ2 had good MP, until the community realized what was broken and the game become an unbalanced, broken mess. KZ's story is also extremely generic. I would put it alongside Gears of War, just below average. Far below CoD and even below Crysis and Battlefield. (and of course, all of these are far far far below the likes of Bioshock, Spec Ops, etc)
Everything people say about Crytek you could easily slap right onto GG as well.
