fatslob-:O said:
megafenix said:
fatslob-:O said:
megafenix said:
here we go again
"
The easiest way that I can explain this is that when you take each unit of time that the Wii U eDRAM can do work with separate tasks as compared to the 1 Gigabyte of slower RAM, the amount of actual Megabytes of RAM that exist during the same time frame is superior with the eDRAM, regardless of the fact that the size and number applied makes the 1 Gigabyte of DDR3 RAM seem larger. These are units of both time and space. Fast eDRAM that can be used at a speed more useful to the CPU and GPU have certain advantages, that when exploited, give the console great gains in performance.
The eDRAM of the Wii U is embedded right onto the chip logic, which for most intent and purposes negates the classic In/Out bottleneck that developers have faced in the past as well. Reading and writing directly in regard to all of the chips on the Multi Chip Module as instructed.
"
|
Do you even read what you post ?
This crappy post has absolutely nothing with what I stated.
|
really?
the amount of actual Megabytes of RAM that exist during the same time frame is superior with the eDRAM
|
Again you didn't even address what initial concerns I had within the first comment of this thread.
That line was worthless and unnessecary as well. Another crappy post from a corporate apologist like yourself but at this point I'm not really surprised.
|
well, is not me you should get angry
is shinen, why dont you tweety them about what you think of their comments?
and why did you bring up haswell anyway?
didnt know that they also had the edram in the same die with the gpu or cpu
wii u has the edram inside the gpu, the only one that access it as cache is the cpu, (probably between 2 to 4 megabytes like the 476fp l3 cache)
besides, is not that ipressive, even gamecube had 512 bits for the ebedded memory
