fatslob-:O said: Well god be damned! I made alot of people really mad here while exposing frauds all at the same time LMAO. |
talk about fruads like edram for just cache when shinen already said is more than that
want me to prove it
even by today standards, gpus pack only kilobytes for caching, not megabytes
do you want a proof on this?
answer quicly, or i will be forced to show everyone here proof of your bullshit and a backup for shinen as well diredctly from ati
will you apologize or continue barking?
decide already, i have wasted many posts asking you this and you just continue avoiding it
very well, i will have to lift my hand it seems
you have 5 minutes
apologize and recognize your mistake about caching, or make my checkmate move to expose you even more
seems you like to be beaten up one time and another
well, time is up, sorry dude, you did this to yourself
i forgot, you actually dont like to investigate, dont worry, here
so, are 32 megabytes really that tiny compared to the internal caches of the gpus for tmus and simd cores?
32 megabytes vs 8KB,16KB or 64Kb?
who wins?
if the l1 cache, texture caches and the global data share are only some kilobytes for caching, shouldnt the 32 megabytes of edra be considered assomething like ram for the gpu?
dont forget that there ar additional 3 megabytes of faster edram+sram, so in reality we are talking about 35 megabytes of embedded memory
and this is howthe great expert in pc tech stuff falls
or maygbe this is how a big troll falls