megafenix said:
fatslob-:O said:
megafenix said:
fatslob-:O said:
AgentZorn said:
fatsob, are you interested in getting a Wii U? You seem to be very interested. |
No sir, I'm only interested in knowing about it's hardware sir. LOL
Once the games come I'll eventually pick it up and enjoy it unlike others here arguing something pointless.
|
like wii u edram being only 70gb/s which suggests an edram of 2048bits despite renesas doesnt support it?
saying things like there is little use for edram since its onlyu 32 megabytes despite eyeofcore schooling you, no sorry, i mean, shinen schooling you?
choosing 1024 bits despìte gamecube was 512 bits more than a decade ago?
choosing rthe worst edram configuration instead of the best or at least th middle one of 4096 bits despite renesdas saying that wii u use the best of the best?
talk about pointless
8192 bits
|
LOL You know that these corporations don't care about you. Quit defending the WII Us specs and start excepting reality. Nintendo obviously cheeped out on the WII U hardware as a whole. Just deal with it.
|
ne, i am not defending the specs, just exposing facts
you should stop desceiving people and lowering the actual specs
coe on, does it really hurt if wii u has 500 gigaflops in the gpu and 563 gb/s of edram bandwidth?
thats not going to make it better than xbox one and ps4, yet it clearly sets it atop the current consoles
what you do is the contrary, you lower the specs so much that arent beleiveable
|
@Bold Man that is some insane thinking you got going on there. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and expecting a different result. You'd fit that mantra perfectly I'd say. Those year later multiplats ain`t superior on the WII U LOL.
I'm not some drone or corporate slave. I have no allegiance to anyone else other than maybe intel. How hard is it to deal with the facts ?!
