Dark_Feanor said:
SvennoJ said:
Dark_Feanor said:
My cellphone has a camera, I never use it. It makes no improviment in my experience of calling people or sending SMS. It has a touchscreen also, and that is not better than a physical keyboard. They probably make may cellphone more expencive.
Last month I went to see a new TV to buy, only found TVs that are either "smart" or 3D, I have no interest in any of those features.
So, what should I do? |
http://www.engadget.com/products/samsung/eh6000-series/
We think that most television snobs will prefer a multi-function display that connects to the internet and turns on when you say “TV on!” However, if extra features seem unnecessary to you, but you won’t settle for less than the best, this television will suit you just fine.
There are still plenty left, you're not looking very hard.
|
Man, I´ve seen this exacly model in a maganize but couldn´t find any where around here or online shop (always out of stock).
But you understand, don´t you? If I have a 360 or a PS3, any "smart" TV is superfluous, with a One or a PS4 would be a overkill.
|
True, it's superfluous yet adding "smart" stuff to tv's doesn't increase the build costs, neither does active 3D (3D ready anyway, when you can't buy it without the glasses that's different). It's all software and a simple wifi antenna baked onto the mother board. Speech recognition software doesn't add anything to the cost either.
The difference with the negativity to Kinect 2.0 is that it does add a substantial cost to the hardware and actually hampers the primary use of the system.
