FatedReality on 23 November 2013
| thekitchensink said: Was it better than the first one? I found the first one decent, but the tone of it all didn't suit its message, and it left out way too much from the book. I'm more hopeful about this one since they ditched the shaky-cam and got the director of I Am Legend, which I loved. |
The tone doesnt really change much just more tension between the people and the capital this time and the directing is MUCH better, no more shacky cam no more ridicoulos angles the movie looks much, much better. Also Catching Fire follows the book much better I saw it twice and very few things were left out of this movie that was in the book. IMO I thought it was a lot better then the first. After I saw the first movie I felt it was "meh" its was good but not that good. This time after seeing Catching Fire I thought it was great defiantly a good movie.
Survivor Millennial vs Gen X!!
