Is anyone surprised by Ryse's score. I mean the evidence of a game lacking in substance was all too apparent to see. I know people wanted to say that the combat was like Batman or God of war, but it truly wasn't.... GOW for example has some very complex battles, and is all about using the right combination/weapon and timing. Which Ryse didn't have from the looks of things (press button and repeat).
What I don't understand is that Ryse's problems were very apparent to anyone with any knowledge of gaming. What surprises me is that Crytek didn't see these issues.
I love Rome/History... but also feel they didn't need to go and create a over the top fantasy story base on the time when the real life events were pretty awesome as is. Sometimes the gaming industry shocks me with it's poor decisions.








