Despite not wanting to own a Wii, I had fun with it the few times I played it. I enjoyed the 360 as well (even owned one for a period of time). And I thoroughly enjoy my PS3.
So it's not like I'm not open to enjoying the experiences on a non-Sony system. So I wouldn't consider someone an "enemy" based on them owning a Microsoft or Nintendo console, or liking Microsoft or Nintendo games. I'd consider someone an "enemy" based on their actions.
And the only "enemy" I'd say I personally have is sales2099 (whenever I reply to him, it's really antagonistic). This is because I know he is GeneralMLD from YouTube and he's was just shit stirrer yet I'm sure he believed every word he said. "Last place bitch", "you need PC to fight your console's battles", "exclusive *not* on PS3" (making it seems as though gamers needed a 360 to play certain games) and the most obnoxious is when you compared similar exclusives, if the metacritic score is better, then that's what matters, not sales. So Forza is better than GT5. But when the metacritic score is lower, it's the sales that matter. So Gears of War 2 and 3 are better than Uncharted 2 and 3. His hypocrisy was/is astounding.
And then it turned out that he ended up being wrong about just about everything he's ever said, so he deleted all of his YouTube videos so other people wouldn't have dirt on him and make him eat his words, and then he ran to VGC and toned it down just a little bit. But he still does it on his page on this site. When someone points out something he's said that ended up being wrong, he'll delete that comment and justify it because "I don't want my page to be cluttered"
But knowing who this person is, and knowing his history from his YouTube videos, and how he acts on this site, I don't want anyone thinking he has a valid opinion about anything relating to the game's industry. He talks a big game but can't admit when he's wrong (which is like 97% of the time) and he deletes all evidence that he ever said anything that was incorrect. Which is why I think, even the most benign thing from him, should be quoted when you respond to him, so that even if he deletes his comment, he can't delete the responder's, so there's a record of him being wrong.
And if he sees this and says "oh, I didn't know you had a little man crush on me following everything I say blah blah blah" or some derivation of that to try and belittle me, well....I'm sorry that someone calling out your hypocritical and "I can dish it out but can't take it" nature makes you possibly think that. But, for example, I don't need to follow everything Jack Thompson does to know he's a hack, because his actions are evident and can lead me to that conclusion. I view you the same way
/rant over
