I will rule the back in forth here as blind console war anger rather than actually on the topic of Killer instinct.
This is the way I see it. One can be critical of a game they never played based only on the opinions of those that have reviewed the game. But those are just opinions and in actuality don't count for all that much. take for instance:
Battle field 4 with a metric score of 87 is "apparently" the best current gaming option for PS4 gamers. That didn't stop cod ghost, a metric 77 (10 points lower) to sell over twice as much games on just about every platform. so the opinion scale is tipped. despite 21 or so opinions respected ones I guess ruled battle field the better game, gamers at large said screw that they say call of duty was the better choice.
Personally, I won't say the ghost is better, I only played cod and I can go off reviews for BF4 but that isn't fair, we all know it isn't fair.
Any one making fun of knack that didn't play it, is just being a MS fanboy. Anyone defending knack that has a ps4 but decided not to get knack is being a hypocritical Sony fan boy.
My point is play what you want. Why do people always have to justify their own dealings by dumb attempts at putting something else down?
The way I see the reviews system is for undecided people. if your not sure and the scores are bad don't buy. But as for KI, I don't care what score a few people give it I'll be getting it. you can always find 21 people that loves or hates a certain game..........








