outlawauron said:
Michael-5 said:
outlawauron said:
Michael-5 said:
I feel scores are over-inflated nowadays, while most of these games are scoring 70-80, they deserve 60-70.
With that said, I voted decent. Sega Dreamcast, Gamecube, X-Box 1, and Wii had a better line-up. I think a good launch lineup needs at least 1 much have title, and PS4/XBO lack that. Dreamcast had Sonic Adventure, Cube had Pikmin/Luigi's Mansion, and Melee followed 2 weeks later, XB1 had Halo, PGR, and Dead or Alive 3, among others, and Wii had Zelda/Wii Sports
|
Be specific.
|
I think Battlefield, Killzone, Assassin's Creed and pretty well every big name game in the launch line up is over rated. Not just for PS4, but in general I feel high budget games never get the scores they really deserve because they fund gaming websites with ads.
Need for Speed especially, no NFS game deserves a score above 75/100, except maybe the original Most Wanted.
I feel Knack got the only honest score, and that's a 60.
|
Have you played BF4, KZ: Shadow Fall, AC4, or NFS Rivals on PS4?
And there's no way in hell Knack is a 60. At least, not based on where I am in the game.
|
I've played BF4 and AC4 on a higer end PC, and played a bit of the Killzone in a store demo so yes I have played these games.
The jump to 1080p on PS4, while visually appealing, doesn't make the games play better either, so had I played them on PS3 it would of made no difference. AC, KZ, and BF are good games, but not phenominal. Good should be 70's, not 80's.
