| cbarroso09 said: welcome to gaming. But why people can't understand that Nintendo games are based around what you described? The difference is that Nintendo is the best on that and the games are more complex. |
lol What does Nintendo have to do with anything here? The point being made in this article can apply to a plethora of games, systems, and publishers/ devs; not just Nintendo. However, you act like Nintendo titles are somehow bashed by reviewers in the industry, despite the fact that most of them rest in the 80s to 90s on Metactic. Stop trying to act Nintendo is somehow a victim here; it just makes you sound deeply upset that nobody wants to buy a Wii-U. Sorry dude, it's just not a good console.
I could write an entire on how Nintendo is far from the best and how their games are far from complex, but I'm just gonna leave with this: Nintendo hasn't truly added something to the industry since they saved it back in the 80s. They've been making the same names for decades now, and it's getting really old. The Wii-U proves this. Also, with the exception of LoZ, Nintendo are far from complex.
0331 Happiness is a belt-fed weapon
