| Michael-5 said: You're the one who keeps bringing up the bee suit and Galaxy in general. I've only really talked about the cat suit, since it's the only new enchancement is see in SM3DW. Look, just because you disagree with me, doesn't mean my points are vague. How much clearer can I say this, when talking about the lack of creativity with 1st party games developed by Nintendo, I won't count 3rd party games published by Nintendo. This is as clear as I can make it because I never insulted 3rd party games published by Nintendo. As for your last point about Fruit and Fighters, you agree that the vast Majority of people won't be able to tell the difference between similar Street Fighter or Similar Smash Bros games right? If you eat and orange from two different countries and it tastes similar, you won't argue that one isn't an orange now would you? Kinda supporting me here. Fighting games with a stick, they appear the same on the surface, but between games the difference can be as big as Oranges to Grapefruits. Brawl and Melee are still oranges, Street Fighters are still grapefruit. -- P.S. I own every Zelda, so it kinda shows you how much peoples opinions can differ. Like I said, with the fruits, you're far too technical. I'm arguing Apples and Oranges, and you're arguing Tangerines and.....other small oranges. |
The bee suit is your own little issue I highlighted designed in levels and all and your only response was comparing it and metal Mario like it's some focal point in a game, again you brought up Galaxy yourself. I have to face/palm your attempts to dodge Lost Levels as no matter how badly you want it to not exist it proves your whole point wrong no two ways about it, the game was later released in the All Stars pack on the SNES so it was released in the west, you've been caught out here just accept it.
Vague arguments are the ones you're employing, arguments such as having similar art style and characters and using it to say they're the same are vague, it'll be like someone saying Mike Tyson and Mohammed Ali are both black and boxers so they're the same, that's how a lot of what you're trying to push is coming across it's not a case of disagreeing with it but describing the type of view being put forth.
Nintendo owned 49% of Rare while the Stampers owned 51% between them but maintained partnership with Nintendo, Rare was second party hence why Nintendo sold their shares when MS bought the Stamper's shares of the studio because the latter could override the former, this isn't like Retro who are fully owned by Nintendo. Hal Laboratories highlights in consistencies because you use them yet W101 a Nintendo IP created back in the 90s by Nintendo doesn't count under your notion because PG developed it, Smash Bros wasn't created by Iwata it was created by Masahiro Sakurai, an IP is just that a franchise belonging to the said company.
The analogy challenges your stance as on the surface a citrus fruit will vaguely resemble other citrus fruits but it's not the same yet under the way you're putting your views forward you'd be saying they're all oranges regardless as you're only looking on the surface and nothing more, Melee and Third Strike play significantly different to their successors from mechanics down to how you handle match up as strategies and approaches like zoning for example are affected by the changes.
