yo_john117 said:
Daisuke72 said:
yo_john117 said:
Daisuke72 said:
Console optimization is a lie for the most part. Thing is if you had a 8800GT you could run Bioshock infinite on low, 720P and get 20 - 30 FPS and it will look comparable to its console counterparts, yes optimization does play a role in it all. But it doesn't suddenly turn a 7770 into a 7850. The less cutdown version of the PS3's GPU could run multiplatform games fine with a Core2Duo, 4GB RAM, with it's limited 512MB VRAM.
And yes, a 7850 could run Ryse at 900P @ 30FPS. EASILY. An overclocked 7850 could give you it at 60FPS
|
Well then, consider me educated! I had no idea (probably mostly because I haven't had all that much experience with PC gaming).
|
Runs Crysis @ 1080P @ 38 FPS with 8xAF(Ryse doesn't have this) and this is how it performs before you overclock it, see that Radeon 7770 at the bottom? The Xbone has a very slighly better GPU than it, like very slightly so the benchmarks would be similair. The PS4's GPU is closer to a 7870, as you can see, the 7870 averages almost twice the resolution than the Xbone, and that doesn't account for Xbone's slow DDR3 RAM which would probably cripple the FPS to lower than the Radeon 7770 if you also take in account for the 10% Kinect takes up....
|
I guess the main reason why I thought that way was because I owned this laptop for a while (but with a lower grade graphics card...a GTX 650M) and bought The Witcher 2 and it could barely play the game on low (anything above that would result in terrible FPS) and playing it on the 360 it looked a good deal better than the PC version on low despite that laptop absolutely blowing the 360 out of the water. My cousin also got that laptop for a while and had the same problems with it so I don't know what was going on with that.
|
did you render the game at 720P?
