| killerzX said: listing an expert on crime data, is like seece and nintendo? no, using an expert and his research proves my point. His agenda is to reveal the truth about crime. And it is a fact that nearly every mass shooting takes place in a so called gun free zone. and no it doesnt exclude public places, as why the gabby giffords shooting is counted as a non gun free zone. fact is more often than not, whether intentionally or not criminals choose easy targets |
There's a huge problem with your argument. It has to do with the fact that you're vaguely referring to "gun free zones" and comparing that to gun control, when it really isn't the same thing and EVEN IF you were to do that, how can you possibly calculate all the times it DID help? How do you count how many times something DIDN'T happen? It didn't happen, so there's no way to know. I am aware the argument CAN go both ways in that since you can't calculate it, it also means we wont know if it's really changing much at all unless we get rid of gun control completely. However, that doesn't change the fact that no one really knows the "facts" of these things. Taking statistics from another country also wouldn't help as different places react differently to different laws.
