Wyrdness said:
fatslob-:O said:
Nonetheless the xbox 360 had ALL of the superior multiplats! The one damage controlling is you. FYI the RCP is more of a coprocessor like the xeon phi rather full blown GPU. The only thing programmable about the RCP is the RSP which is based off of the MIPS 4000 integer vector processor. Hence, why it's a co-processor rather than a GPU. As for the RDP that's fixed function. The RCP is getting those things because that thing is practically a CPU that acts like a GPU for the most part and y'know what CPU's did back in the day ? (You probably don't know. Answer carefully otherwise you'll be branded as a fraud for that "I game on PC" cop out statement.) When did ken kutuaragi fight tooth and nail for a GPU ? If anything that dude wanted the PS3 to be cell processor only machine. It was the engineers with ken kutaragi that argued that the GPU was necessary.
What more delusional crap do you want to bring up now ?
|
I think you should look up what damage control means before you use it as a number of you posts contain incoherant uses of terms and words, the RCP was dedicated to doing the work of a GPU hence why I pointed out all consoles need a GPU of some form that's the point, yeah I got the engineers mixed up yet it still proves my point that something dedicated to graphical duties has to be there. What's hilarious is your constant babble about gaming on PC highlighting that you must well beyond upset about it, explain where gaming on PC means you have to be a tech head I have over 100 games (concrete proof, something you're not familiar with) on my Steam account as well as several on my Battle.Net account and even Streaming Diablo 3. I'd honestly be surprised if you knew what a CPU is tbh let alone what it does, for your knowledge a CPU executes logical, input/output of a system by following the instructions of programing seeing as you ask.
Gaming on PC means just that kiddo, I'm a gamer on the PC platform go back and read and you'll see I never said to be a tech head, the irony in your post is that you've formed some delusional view of this thinking the's an underlining meaning trying to disprove it with words like fraud yet your own self professed technical know how has been called out and questioned and quite effectively as well, for all your attempts to look slick you just look mad now.
|
Still haven't haven't answered why CPUs were important back in they day eh ? You still side stepping the fact that the RCP was a co-processor instead of a GPU eh ? Just because some processor is dedicated to doing the work of a GPU doesn't mean that it's a GPU. (Ever heard of software rendering, fraud ?)
@Bold Dat all you know ? LOLOL
