Daisuke72 said:
snowdog said:
Daisuke72 said:
snowdog said:
He was wrong. More than 3 times more cache for the GPU, 3 times more cache for the CPU, a DSP, an out-of-order execution CPU, a CPU with half the stages in its pipeline, a DX11-equivalent feature set and 4 times the RAM says he was wrong.
And if that isn't enough then Sonic Racing Transformed, Need For Speed Most Wanted, the gimping of Rayman Legends removing half of those black things from the swarm so that it would run on the PS3 and 360, Pikmin 3, The Wonderful 101, Super Mario 3D World, Bayonetta 2, X, Mario Kart 8 and SSBU all say he's wrong. |
He always said the Wii U had the advantage in RAM, and overall efficiency. So? At the end of the day the Wii U is closer to current gen than it is next, and it's alot closer to current, which was his initial point, which you tried arguing and still are.
|
He was wrong. It's as simple as that. Being somewhere between the 360 and PS4 in terms of power isn't 'on par' with the 360...unless you change the meaning of the words 'on par'. The Wii U is around 3-4 times more powerful than the 360, but that doesn't for a second mean that games will be 3-4 times better looking.
We've already seen the PS4 and One struggling to run games at a higher resolution than 720p and the difference between the 360 and the PS4 and One in terms of power is a great deal bigger.
|
Four times as powerful? Not even close, but keep telling yourself that, I would go in-depth, but last time we had this discussion you pretty much speculated on everything. Hell, every reply started with something like.
"I think..."
"Nintendo has complex..."
But like I said, just putting it out there, Ninjablade was right. Ninjablade won. RIP my nigga Ninja.
|
