F0X said:
fatslob-:O said:
F0X said:
I hate to see this discussion devolve so much. :/
Let me rephrase something I've said earlier: I could choose to believe this information, and that would be fine. There's nothing wrong with putting stock in a good theory, especially when it has supporting evidence. Or I can wait for hard confirmation before coming to my own conclusions. Or I could simply not care at all and make my conclusions about the hardware based on whether or not it has games I desperately want to play.
And all of those viewpoints are logical in their own sense, so I'm left wondering why this thread is rapidly becoming devoid of respect, and by extension, respect for logical thought. |
Dudes like eyeofcore in this is an eye sore to high tech discussion. If we keep ignorant people like him out we can solve the puzzle more easily without disruptions from him. Others like Teriol keep going on to damage control.
It's devoid of respect because they can't respect an opposing view of another but yeah you should buy the consoles based on games not hardware.
|
Yeah, there's too much needless damage control going on. The games being released for Wii U look good. Some of the recent third-party multiplats are passable (Assassin's Creed IV comes to mind). And even the digital scene is shaping up to be something good. Why the insecurity?
As the old joke goes, Wii U doesn't need more flops. :P
|
There some games that I do want to play on the wii u!
