IsawYoshi said:
You didn't read everything I said. I'm not saying PS3 was a failure. But it sold less than PS2, quite a lot actually, AND it let the other console developers get up. PS2 strangeled Xbox and Nintendo, PS3 gave them oxygen. I doubt Sony think of the PS3 as a sucsess in the same way they look at PS2, and, once again, Nintendo were the cear winner of the gen. No matter sales of consoles or not, people considered them done, and they came back and reclaimed the throne, forcing Sony and Microsoft to start with motion controlls as well. |
No, I read everything, and understood it perfectly. Nowhere did you say the PS3 was a failure, but because it "went down" to a possible 100M, while Nintendo and Microsoft jumped considerably, you can't say Sony "won" because they let the competition catch up and didn't sell as much as last gen. Well, how many PS2s/GCs/XBs were sold? 190M? How many consoles have sold this gen? 260M? So is it really so much as "they let the competition catch up" or is it "the gaming market has expanded"? I'm sure the latter is a more legitimate answer since total home console sales have grown by almost 40%.
And like I said, regarding comparisons to the PS2, the PS2 was on the market for 13 years. The PS3 has been on the market for 7 years. You can't ignore the fact that the PS2 was available for almost double the time the PS3 has been, and then use that to knock the PS3 for "selling less". Otherwise the, like in the analogy, the iPhone 5s just hasn't done as well as the iPhone 4s (even though the 4s has been out for 2 years and the 5s has been out for 2 months)








