Lyricsforce24 IGN has more than one reviewer each channel. One of the guys for the IGN Wii channel wasn't with IGN when MP1 was released. That stated, I find all reviews utterly useless. If a game is a new IP it gets screwed and known IPs are usually scored to highly. The last straw for me with reviews was Lost Odyssey. That game has been pretty much underscored by all western reviewers and the Gamespy reviewer should be fired for incompetence.
Darc Requium....I know IGN has more than one reviewer. I was stating that as a whole, for every game system website on ign...ps3, 360. wii, ds, psp, ds, etc, they review sequels, even when they say they are better, with a lower review score than first game released. I believe they need to address that better because it does not make sense. If a game is better it deserves a better review score, even if it is a different reviewer, in my opinion and i understand that is also debatable because of different reviewers. I dont remember Bozon being with IGN at the release of Metroid Prime , but Matt Cassimassina was even though he didnt review the first metroid prime game, and he is one of the top dog for ign Wii. I dont like the games reviews he has given because he just seems to be with silly nitpicking that knocks the scores down lower than it realy should be, IMO. I was basically just agreeing with the guy who started this thread that i did not like most game reviewer scores, especially of a game i really enjoy that i feel that deserves better. You probably understand where i am coming from with your displeasement with the Lost Odyssey review score. I think it sucks that those websites get so much attention and so many people see only their review scores and they assume it was a bad game. Remember IGN's assassins creed score was also a highly debatable low score.
