Dr.EisDrachenJaeger said:
Zekkyou said:
Dr.EisDrachenJaeger said:
You're missing the point, you trying to argue the Vita was any sort of "risk or massive upgrade, when it was just a response to changing with the times" is absolute ridiculous. Its garbage. Its a fallacious proposal.
Like I said they 3DS is one weird little console. Thats about as risky as any of this shit gets.
You're trying to make something out of nothing and its pitiful.
Go sit in a corner and think about what you've done. |
Ah i see, so your one of the users who prefer to be condescending rather than build a stable argument ^^
I never said the Vita itself was a massive upgrade or risk, i said compared to the 3DS it was. I've said that a few times now but you still seem to be incapable of understanding the concept of a subjective statement.
I fail to see how the 3DS is "weird" at all. The DS sold 150 million units, and the 3DS is essentially the same. That's hardly a risk, that's building something for an audience you already know is there. A risk is when you do something to capture a new market or bring to the table a brand new concept, which the 3DS does not (the Wii is a good example of something that did both). As i said, your inability to name me a single "risky" feature of the 3DS backs up my argument more than anything i myself could say.
As the saying goes, an argument is not won when a point is proven, but when the opponent resorts to personal attacks rather than debate :) I shall leave you too it now, seeing as you have resorted to the latter.
|
No you dont get to circle jerk like that. You came in with a ludicrous argument about how the vita "wasnt playing it safe" and you have nothing to back that up. By your "own standards" the 3DS isnt playing it safe either because they Vita and the 3DS are in the same ball park when it comes to improving on their predecessors. What you're doing is extremely ignorant.
|
How about you two stop talking past eachother. Neither handheld was all that innovative and risky. The 3DS had _one_ real new addition, the 3D. If you want to call that innovative, whatever. The PSV had _one_ real new addition, the touch controls. If you want to call that innovative, whatever. The fact that the PSV has a screen that trumps everything else doesn't really matter. The fact that the 3DS has X number of cameras doesn't really matter. The fact that both handhelds had axis motion control, irrelevant.
IMO both consoles were a 'safe' bet. Both the 3DS and the PSV came out _too_ expensive and that shows plainly when you consider how they started off. The difference is that the 3DS was cheaper to build to start with, Nintendo was willing to bite the bullet with a price cut taking the hit in profit to set it rolling and SONY is not.
