BrainCramps said:
Madword said:
ironmanDX said:
Funny, the people who called the Xbox One weak for a drop in resolution in favour of 60fps are nowhere to be seen in this thread. |
Some of us were at work ;)
Hey we dont yet know what FPS the XboxOne version runs at. If it runs at the same FPS as Sony's but at 720... then thats a bigger problem right? According to the sources on Neogaf both versions were having performance issues, so wouldnt get too excited just yet.
Finally why is it that the xboxOne version is no where to be seen for another two weeks as it's been embargo'd... very fishy if you ask me.
I think BF4 is a good comparison, that ran at 900 vs 720 and was still running higher than the XboxOne version... who is to suggest anything different this time around.
Finally... one review i read was that the FPS dip was "Occasional" are we really getting over excited by dips in FPS that are occasional?
|
Irony is, he was wrong...........same people are posting, what is sad is when the 720P x1 version also has fram drops, they won;t be seen anywhere lol.
|
The problem is that we also don't know what kind of FPS drop... how much by, is there a patch incoming, it seems reviewers are getting lazy... But the big question they should be asking on top of that is... Why is there an embargo on the XboxOne versions of 3rd party games. 1st party, you can make it look nice and as you have no other versions to compare it by then it stands mainly on its gameplay, but 3rd partys is a good picture of early issues/problems/"Balance"... but apparently no journo is bothered about that right now.
