Funny thing :
Here is what Kyle Orland wrote a month and a half ago: http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-09/10/vita-tv-and-microconsoles
"
Games made for the Vita's native resolution of 960 x 544 are going to look decidedly worse when stretched out onto a 1,080p HDTV screen, and they won't be able to handle as many moving parts under the hood as similar games on the PS3 or PS4."
That's fine if you're into playing great, simple games like Divekick or Lumines or Spelunky, games that are perfect for the subway or a long plane trip. But these are not the kinds of games that sell systems made for the living room. In general, people in the market for a game console want something that is going to make the most use of the expensive flat-screen TV and surround sound entertainment centre they've invested in. In that environment, consumers are less likely to skimp on the actual gaming hardware and more likely to go for something that they can really show off, even if it costs a bit more."
Yup, hypocrite, full of lies.
after reading this, you have to wonder what the site's relationship is with MS
Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:
PS4: 17m XB1: 10m WiiU: 10m Vita: 10m
