By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Vinniegambini said:
KingdomHeartsFan said:

So does this include Monster Hunter and Pokemon sales in the 200m operating lose?

Monster Hunter yes - Pokemon no

Monster Hunter is a third-party title = less profit (5-7$ per unit)

Pokemon is a first-party titles = more profit (28-30$ per unit)

If that's true then $28*4.1m = 115m so the operating loss would be less than half of what it is now with Pokemon included.