|
bananaking21 said: i honestly want to see how people compare it to forza. i asked nnodley because like me, he studied (well he is still sutdying) 3D animaton, and we are cool. i do like visual comparisons. forza is without a doubt a great looking tittle, but i always felt it went way over the top with how shiny and clean it looks. and i just want to compare. anybody who replies to me looking for a flaimwar i just wont repsond to. |
well, especially the "very colourful" style of forza is also a question of taste. i always thought turn 10 wants to build a sim on real race tracks (well, those which are on real race tracks) but still wants to let it look like a video game with brighter colours and so on... because that is pretty much the case in all of their games.
but from a technical perspective driveclub has it much easier to look good so that it isn't something special and rather something everyone should expect. some driveclub guy even said some month ago that they will aim 30fps because he rather likes to let the game look better. that is something turn 10 or a developer like polyphony would never do for their main forza or gt games. 60fps is obviously much more important in forza and gt but don't you think if the same forza game would be in 30fps that it would look better?
now it is possible that driveclub will also have 60fps but that has to be seen before we talk about that then.
i just wonder why people always compare driveclub and forza and not with other racing games like nfs. i mean, nfs is not like driveclub but drveclub is also not like forza. but if you compare games with each other just because they have cars then compare them all with each other?
but in general i think people should simply expect that first party games on ps4 will look better as xb1 first party games. that's why it is a stronger hardware, to get more out of it. comparisons of games on the same hardware make much more sense in my opinion.
