CGI-Quality said:
XxGame4lifexX said:
CGI-Quality said:
XxGame4lifexX said:
CGI-Quality said:
Like you, I don't know one way or the other. Unlike you, I'm not making assumptions without backing. Fact - they didn't go through with it and we never saw any indication that they were going to (regardless of what went on behind the scenes).
|
I never said you were making assumptions. I was talking about all those others than think it wasen't on Sony's plan. If microsoft would have done it Sony would have too. Look at the features on xbox. Look at what sony is doing. Adding party chat, voice/facial recognition. Features from the xbox that sony is adding at the last minute. Sony would have done DRM also. Plus microsoft would have been making money from DRM and sony loves making money as much as Microsoft does.
|
I'm saying YOU are making wild assumptions. This post only continues it. Sony said from Day 1 that DRM would be up to third party devs. No assumptions there. Just because it was Microsoft's plan doesn't mean it was also theirs. They don't exist in a vacuum.
|
Believe everything sony says, huh?
Yes, pretty much like everyone else.
If sony says something then its true.
Funny!
|
You've presented nothing tangible nor indisputable. Thus, I should take your word instead?
|
Just wanted to say thanks, CGI. Had I responded, it would have been a huge waste of my time. Anyway, once again, thanks for being a part of the vgc forums. You bring class here and it's really nice to see someone using facts instead of making assumptions based on their bias.