NobleTeam360 said:
Aerys said:
J_Allard said:
Rafux said:
J_Allard said:
Aerys said: Cboat said activision is trying hard to get 1080p ( or 900p at least?) on Xbox One. I think they can but they will sacrifice something else like the framerate, to be able to say " its also 1080p on xbox one ! (but dont look at the framerate please) " |
I highly doubt it.
Even if Activision comes out and confirms the PS4 version is native 1080p, the IGN coverage this week has, from a graphics point of view, been pretty shitty. That has been the pretty popular reaction to the footage. But, does anyone care about graphics in CoD? People play CoD for the silky smooth gameplay and the frame rate. I think Activision would compromise resolution way before frame rate, they did it all of this current gen.
And if they have to settle for 720p at launch, will it be a big deal? No. People would still buy the game on Xbox and play it on Xbox. But, if they put out a game that looked identical to the PS4 version, but ran like ass in comparison? That might be a big deal down the line.
Activision doesn't care about the ramblings of us nerdlings on the Internet. The people making the biggest stink over this are people who are not going to be buying an Xbox One anyway. What they are more concerned with are the millions and millions that buy the console down the line. Those people don't give a shit about resolution, they want the fluid CoD gameplay.
|
Its not just about COD is also about Xbone costing $100 more and being less powerful than PS4, its about multiplats being superior on PS4, its about PS4 being the easiest to develop games while being the most powerful yet cheaper console.
|
Most of that is heresay and is irrelevant to the discussion about Activision and CoD anyway.
So lets say the Xbone is massively less powerful and IW has to make sacrifices. All I am saying is they would sacrifice resolution before they sacrifice frame rate.
|
Like he said, its not about COD, its about Microsoft and the xbox one being less powerful than the PS4 for $100 more with real differences in games. ( what most of people didnt believe, when there will be facts, they wont be able to deny it anymore)
It would be very bad for microsoft and they are in partnership, this is why activision is trying hard to improve that, Xbox one reputation depends on this big game and everyone is looking at the resolution now, so they could make sacrifices on other things while people are not looking and focusing on the resolution ( maybe not the frame rate).
|
I'm sure the Xbox One is more expensive because it has the kinect included, so it's not like MS is trying to rip people off into buying the less powerful console for a higher price.
|
Indeed, that would be great...IF kinect was really useful in games, but all the games can be played without kinect, if there was a big kinect game like sombiU did for the Wii U gamepad.
Most people dont know the more expensive system is also the less powerful ( in fact, most people think more expensive = more powerful without even thinking that kinect could cost 150-200$ )