By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Whitefire said:
orniletter said:

Seriously, I´m done !

You wont force some knowledge in this.......human beeing, It is literally pointless when someone closes his eyes so hard and grasps at every little straw and insane counter argument.

It is sad, absolutely sad that some people are unable to see the writing on the wall and just ignore ecerything our scientists have accomplished over the last 150 years because you can´turn a reptile in a bird in mere seconds.

schocking !

Scientists being the evolutionists, and not the creationist scientists, because they aren't using real science, right? And there is only one way to interpret evidence?

Got it.

No, there's not one way to interpret data, that's why scientists are constantly debating what data means and searching for more evidence/data to support or disprove their argument. The more data you have, the more confident you can be in your conclusions.

The theory of evolution has gotten to the point where the actual scientific community see it as fact. The intricate details of how evolution occurs at the biochemical level, the links between genes, gene expression, proteins and RNA, or why certain traits are kept are up for debate. All the actual evidence points evolution, and if actual evidence and data for a competing theory was brought forward, it would start a whole new branch of science. That's how science works.

Creationist science isn't science because of the lack of hard data and evidence. No amount of interpretation will help if the data gathering isn't robust enough.