Reviews are a crutch for people who lack the ability to form their own opinion or grasp that the success or worth of a game is highly subjective. Your best indicators are the sales and fanbase, its just pretencious to think there is a single standard by which a game can be called good or not, and most seem to think this standard is Game Reviewers. While there is no arguing many agree with them, the fact of the matter remains that their primary use is in deciding what games to pursue, not deciding which games are the best after the fact. When you try and use Game Reviewers as proof of anything, you're just being childish and vain. Right now the issue is popular because of all the Ps3 games that are selling poorly and Sony Fans who want desperately to find solice in the fact. Thus Game Reviewers become a popular avenue for convincing ones self that they made the right choice even though the market doesn't reflect it.







