PS3 vs. Xbox 360 ports - Microsoft's rebuttal

[Final-Fan]

Fanatical111 said:

kingofwale said:

Fanatical111 said:

kingofwale said:
>Cant say I am surprised that you are the guy who said that, obvious PS3 fanboy/troll but in any case no, im not judging by EA's standard, its called an example. Here ill throw you another bone, how about...the Orange Box or...Ghost Recon, you take your pick.

If you definition of "throw me another bone" is talking about "Orange Box", you obviously know less about games than I care to reply.

Good night to you!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Orange_Box read where it says developed donkey. I work for EA and as such am pretty aware of who paid for the development and it wasn't us.

Maybe ask around to find out who actually did the PORTING for PS3 version?

Man, how am I not surprise to see such characters working for EA? :)

I dont need to ask around. Valve developed the game for the 360 (primary engine) and it was ported to the PS3 by Valve not EA. I am sure there may have been some fiancial assistance and resource support from EA but it is Valves game not EA's plain and simple. Valve should take the ownership for the shitty port not the company who funded and assited them to do it.

Again my point was simple but too difficult for you to understand. Like I send before, when a multiplat game is better on the PS3 then the 360 I will go out and get the PS3 version, all I am saying is that I have yet to see that and based on some terrible ports, I perfer multiplat games on the 360.

Quoted from Wikipedia:  "While the Windows and Xbox 360 versions of The Orange Box were developed and published by Valve, the development of the PlayStation 3 port was outsourced to Electronic Arts."
(emphasis added by me)

I'm the last person to reflexively defend kingofwale (slightly the opposite in fact) but in this case your own linked source material shows that you are wrong and that he is right.  That is pretty epic failure, and a little bit sad.