windbane on 04 March 2008
| Oyvoyvoyv said: Well, GR is biased because they only take into account American reviews. 3 german magazines have reviewed Brawl, are any of them mentioned? Nope. (Although some European get counted) Famitsu has reviewed it, and they use 4 people. Is a single one counted? Nope Do they add the Nintendo Magazine in Japan? No. Do they add the Nintendo Magazine in America? Yes They are most pro 360, then Ps3, then PsP, then DS then Wii. Or something like that. Actually, Gamestats is much more correct, as they take in reviews from everywhere. And hey, this is for Mario Kart, stop posting about everything else. You had to put "imo" in there didn't you? Now you can claim that it was just your opinion and that it is worth as much as everybody elses and blah blah blah. "I don't like Zack and Wiki. Critics do. Another reason the media isn't biased against the Wii. I can accept that my opinion differs on that review." Wow, that's just great. I think you proved everybody else's point right there. |
Just because certain regions are biased towards certain types of games doesn't mean the reviewers are. The great thing about aggregate sites is that the bias of a few reviewers is lessened. If gamestats is better then I'll check it out. I like gamerankings more than metacritic but metacritic's site is easier to compare recent reviews. I'm not sure what point "everybody else" is trying to make, but I didn't find Zack and Wiki enjoyable. I'm not sure if anyone has even bothered to discuss that with me, so I'm baffled why that keeps being brought up. I respond to someone else and people act like I brought it up.
