S-E says their White Engine is not too powerful for the Wii.

[GhaudePhaede010]

LordTheNightKnight said:

GhaudePhaede010 said:
Dude, what are you thinking/drinking? I was talking about how SquareEnix ("they" = SquareEnix) will view the game, not the public. Those are the responses SquareEnix will give as to why the game will, or will not sell well. THAT is what makes it a lose-lose situation for Nintendo. Your post is based on a misunderstanding of my complaints and I will leave it at that. I could give a shit about consumers. I am talking developer relations here.

And mascot games or not, having DISNEY as the second half of your cast is screaming KIDDY! It is the most blatant kiddy (I will even go as to say main story line) game they make. Having it on Nintendo's console does nothing to encourage other third parties to try making diverse titles. And that is the biggest problem. Give us a series that will actually mean something and break down those barriers.

I guess I should have been more clear. Sorry to waste your time like that.

If you just mean S-E, they are already putting games that might be considered "kiddy" on the Wii, so they obviously don't have a problem with that. Hence, youre complaints are still wrong. 

 

What you just said only further proves my point. And it seems, you did not even read everything I typed. Clearly, you and I were not on the same level to begin with, I take the blame for that, but to say that my complaints are wrong is crazy right now. My complaint is that I do not want these types of games to continue being the normal. You are saying I should not have that complaint? Yet later, you will probably complain about the content Wii has to offer. Clearly, this game would not create a positive atmosphere for Nintendo relations with not only SquareEnix, but all third parties, so why would I want it to happen? More than that, how can I be wrong for my opinion?

Please read everything I wrote again. I feel you missed my point here. As a matter of fact, nothing you have said makes any sense at this point. You might want to go back and try to refute my second post again. Now that you understand what I meant. Then, I can understand you better.