I don't understand why people are just taking his word for it in this thread? Innocent til proven guilty and all that? I'm not saying that he's wrong, but lets at least wait for Rockstar to respond before jumping on their back.
If you think about what is in this game and the history of its predecessors, do you not think this game would have gone through scores of legal reviews? Or the very plausible idea that given the..non-remarkability of these two tracks, that Rockstar would have been much more inclined to just find another artist and provide them the chance to get their music listened to by over 20 million people instead of just saying ' f*ck it, this is totally worth the risk of getting sued for millions'? This isn't some buried code like hot coffee that may have been missed by a legal review, this is in the game, on a track listing, easily accessible and reviewable part of the game content.
My money is on mis-communication between Daz and the respective labels ('nothing but a cavi hit' was released by Da Dogg Pound on the Priority Records label, which is owned by Capital records who in turn is owned by Universal Music Group. C-Walk was released by Kurupt on the A&M label, which is also owned by Universal Music Group).
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
