VD-Dev "pushing the 3DS to its limits"

[fatslob-:O]

JoeTheBro said:

fatslob-:O said:

JoeTheBro said:

fatslob-:O said:

JoeTheBro said:

3D doesn't take anything close to 4x the computational effort. It's actually between 1X and 2X depending on the technology.

Trust me, I'm an expert

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/3d-vision-surround-stereoscopic-gaming,2672-6.html

......right

FPS != computational effort. When you bundle two graphics cards do you have double the computational power? Basically. Do you have double the fps? Not really.

What part of "I'm an expert" don't you understand? I know this stuff man ;)

@Bold What does this have to do about the discussion of how computationally expensive a 3D frame is ? 

That's cause your likely not an expert at this stuff. ;)

Your link shows FPS in games with 3D on and 3D off. Was there something else at that link I was supposed to notice? Otherwise my comment is just as on topic as your link.

As far as being an expert, I'm obsessed with 3D even more than Kaizar is. So obsessed that I incorporated it into my profession. I'm not going to spill the beans on my credentials since I'd like to stay anonymous at least a little bit longer so if you don't believe me, I can find other sources that say the same thing.

The link was supposed to show how computationally expensive 3D is. It seems you missed the point of that link.

Then I'm sure you know why I explained how computationally expenisve it is. Do you have any explanation as to why it's not very expensive if i'm missing something ?