By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Chrizum said:

Har dee fucking har. I was being serious, it's not expected from a 17-year old to speak rationally about business. I sure as hell know I couldn't when I was 17. Do you see 17-year olds making business decisions at billion-dollar corporations?


My argument is that, when discussing business in depth, terms like "King of Videogames" -which has no meaning whatsoever- have no place. Although I could totally understand why a teenager would coin such a term.


For brevitiys sake, let me just list the weaknesses in this post in bullet list format:

  • You are implying that my points are not rational, but you have not given any reasoning for why that is the case, and none is forthcoming either since that implication is false.
  • I am not 17 years old, as I already stated. Your point is meaningless
  • I could speak rationally about business when I was 17, your personal experience is of little relevance here
  • Being able to hold a rational conversation about business does not require the ability to make business decisionsfor billion-dollar corporations
  • 'We' are not discussiong business in depth. At best that is something you seem to think has a place in this discussion
  • The term King of Videogames is derived from my assertion that Nintendo is the undisputed king of videogames, or in other words, the most important player in the videogame business when you consider the full history of the business.