Mnementh said:
fatslob-:O said:
Mnementh said:
fatslob-:O said:
@Everyone
Honest to god the 3DS isn't anywhere near an impressive piece of equipment. You will never have games that will likely go above PSP graphics or performance because of the fact that nintendo made 3D a mandatory implimentation to the system that isn't even twice as powerful as the PSP was. So if I were you guys I would focus on the games because the 3DS isn't capable of all too much considering metal gear ran 20fps compared to the more smoother 30fps on the PS2. |
I don't want to comment too much on your poor effort to bash the 3DS, but in no way 3D is mandatory. The devs decide mostly (but not all) to take advantage of this possibility. Must be because they like it or that they think this makes their game look better (and usually it does).
|
In no was my comment made to bash the 3DS but rather it was to reveal what it was truly capable of and whether you like it not the fact is the 3DS is weaker than a gamecube and almost every game uses the 3D effect to diminish it's power and that leaves it very little space to improve on a graphics front.
|
You moving the goalposts. You were saying:
"because of the fact that nintendo made 3D a mandatory implimentation to the system that isn't even twice as powerful as the PSP was"
I was referring to the part, that Nintendo made 3D mandatory, that is clearly not the case. Devs choose to use that feature mostly. Now you also speak about 'mostly': "almost every game uses the 3D effect to diminish it's power"
So you basically admit that you was wrong and I was right without really saying it to leave the impression you were rigth all along. No, you made stuff up.
|
That still doesn't make me wrong that almost every developer will impliment it and BTW snake eater 3D was runing at a choopy 20fps compared to the more smoother 30fps of the PS2 version. It won't matter whether it was "mostly" or "mandatory" since every AAA developer has being using it so you can forget about trying to use the arguement against me.
